Navigating the Saas-pocalypse

Watch on YouTube ↗  |  February 23, 2026 at 17:28  |  4:55  |  CNBC
Speakers
Deirdre Bosa — Anchor, CNBC TechCheck — CNBC anchor, tech reporter

Summary

  • The "SaaS-pocalypse" narrative is dominating market sentiment, causing software stocks to decouple from their fundamental earnings; good reports (ServiceNow, Palantir) are being sold off.
  • A comparison is being drawn between current software stocks and Newspaper stocks (2002-2009): earnings may hold up initially while valuations collapse due to impending technological obsolescence.
  • Specific fears revolve around "AI Agents" replacing white-collar workflows (HR, Finance) and coding tasks, threatening the terminal value of back-office and cybersecurity incumbents.
  • The market is currently in a "sell first, ask questions later" mode for software, with technicals on the IGV ETF showing a bearish flag pattern.
Trade Ideas
Deirdre Bosa Anchor/Reporter, CNBC Tech Check 1:15
"Right now, even winning is not enough. ServiceNow and Palantir have already reported both showing real traction, yet investors, they aren't buying it... In the meantime, it's just a sell." The market has shifted from trading on fundamentals to trading on existential risk. When positive earnings result in stock price declines, it indicates a broken sentiment regime. The "Newspaper 2002-2009" analogy suggests a long period of multiple compression where the market prices in disruption years before the P&L reflects it. Short or Avoid. The sector is undergoing a structural de-rating. Technicals on IGV show a bearish flag pattern. A sudden shift in narrative or "blowout" earnings that are too good to ignore could trigger a short squeeze.
Deirdre Bosa Anchor/Reporter, CNBC Tech Check 2:11
Workday has to answer "whether HR and finance software survives when AI can automate those workflows directly." Regarding CrowdStrike: "When agents can write and they can deploy code, they can also scan and patch it." This is the "Second-Order" AI threat. It's not just about AI writing text; it's about AI Agents performing the specific job functions these platforms were built to facilitate. If an AI agent can autonomously patch code or manage HR workflows, the "seat-based" SaaS pricing model faces an existential crisis. Avoid. These specific sub-sectors (Back Office and Patch Management) are in the direct crosshairs of the "AI Agent" narrative. These companies may successfully integrate AI agents into their own platforms (becoming the disruptor), proving the bear case wrong.
Deirdre Bosa Anchor/Reporter, CNBC Tech Check 4:20
"Is the New York Times still a newspaper company? Like absolutely not... It made sure that it wasn't the thing that was being disrupted... That's what, for example, like a Figma is doing... partnering with an Anthropic." Survival in a disruption cycle requires a radical pivot. NYT survived the internet by becoming a gaming/recipe bundle. Software companies must pivot from being "tools for humans" to "platforms for AI" (like Figma's partnership with Anthropic) to survive. Watch for software companies announcing deep, structural partnerships with AI model providers (like Anthropic) or pivoting revenue models. These are the potential long-term winners emerging from the sell-off. Pivots are difficult to execute and capital intensive; many legacy firms will fail to make the transition.
Up Next

This CNBC video, published February 23, 2026, features Deirdre Bosa discussing CRM, SNOW, WDAY, NOW, PLTR, IGV, CRWD, FIGMA, ANTHROPIC, NYT. 3 trade ideas extracted by AI with direction and confidence scoring.

Speakers: Deirdre Bosa  · Tickers: CRM, SNOW, WDAY, NOW, PLTR, IGV, CRWD, FIGMA, ANTHROPIC, NYT