AFRM Affirm Holdings, Inc. Loading... : Investor Sentiment and Bull/Bear Views

Loading chart...
Top Calls

No data yet

Price change since each call, adjusted for long/short direction. Results calculated:

Feed
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
All Content✓
Source feeds
Buzzberg Top 50 ✓
All market capsNo capitalization filter✓
200 B and aboveMega✓
10 B to 200 BLarge✓
2 B to 10 BMid✓
0 to 2 BSmall✓
Custom
Enter market cap range in B USD
Time Author Thesis Company / ticker Signal Since call Position Source
19:56
Sep 23
TBPN
Affirm's AI underwriting lifts moat.
Affirm's new attention-based underwriting models outperform its gradient-boosted tree models by a factor of two, enabling more inclusive lending while maintaining credit performance. The UK Amazon launch, diverse capital-markets funding, agentic-payment positioning, and internal developer productivity gains reinforce its moat against newer AI payment startups.
AFRM Affirm Holdings, Inc. Long — —
20:58
Sep 18
CNBC
AI underwriting expands loans at stable losses
Affirm's new AI underwriting model is designed to approve more borrowers and expand credit access while maintaining same-or-better loss rates, using 15 years of machine learning and transformer-based models to analyze data that traditional underwriting discards. This should support more lending and productivity without needing staff cuts to fund AI token usage.
AFRM Affirm Holdings, Inc. Long — —
22:45
Sep 17
r/wallstreetbets
AFRM puts bet on yen carry unwind
The author holds $62 strike puts on AFRM expiring the next day and wants a broad market crash to push the stock down. The stated catalyst is a potential unwind of the Japanese yen carry trade causing a circuit-breaker-style selloff. The main risk is that the puts expire worthless if no such macro shock materializes.
AFRM Affirm Holdings, Inc. Short — —
Log in to see ideas

About AFRM Investor Commentary

Across the available history and selected sources, Buzzberg tracks AFRM (Affirm Holdings, Inc.) across 29 sources: 27 bullish vs 6 bearish calls from 33 authors. Historical directional balance: 35% = 100 × (bullish − bearish) / all deduplicated idea records, including other directions. This is neither a probability of a price rise nor the share of bullish authors. 60 total trade ideas tracked. Past 7 days, before deduplication: 1 other directions. Latest voices: Max Levchin, u/_Doomer_Wojack_.