Fed Governor Stephen Miran dissents in favor of bigger rate cuts, a stance he has not changed despite the Iran war and rising oil prices.
Argues the Fed traditionally "looks through" oil price shocks because they impact price levels immediately, while monetary policy affects the economy with a 12-18 month lag.
Sees two scenarios where an oil shock could warrant a policy response: a wage-price spiral or a rise in medium-to-long-term inflation expectations. He asserts there is "no evidence" for either.
Points to CPI swap data: 1-year expectations rose with immediate prices, but forward rates (1y1y, 1y2y, 1y3y) are stable, and 5y5y forward inflation expectations have been coming down.
Believes the labor market has been on a "gradual cooling trend for three years," making a wage-price spiral "extremely unlikely."
Contrarian view: He is more concerned about weaker growth and higher unemployment than inflation. Higher oil/gas prices reduce consumer spending on other goods, lowering aggregate demand.
Implies this demand reduction could exacerbate labor market cooling, a downside risk the Fed should accommodate with easier policy.
Acknowledges his view differs from Chair Powell and other Fed officials who have highlighted rising inflationary risks.
Attributes recent market volatility (pricing out cuts, pricing in hikes) to wartime conditions and is "disinclined to read too much into that."