El-Erian warns the economy is moving from a price shock to combined price and demand shocks due to the war, triggered by multiple tipping points.
He is more concerned than average because the war is asymmetrical, with three to four parties believing they're winning, making it hard to end.
Demand destruction is accumulating globally, with Asia worried about physical shortages, not just high oil prices, which could be another tipping point.
He has shifted from reduced risk to maximum risk and now finds only a few individual stocks attractive, but would not buy the broad market index at this juncture.
In absolute terms, the U.S. faces an energy price shock leading to an inflation shock, likely reducing spending, especially for lower-income households.
If the war continues, the sequence could escalate to financial instability, starting from energy shock to inflation shock to demand shock.
Key tipping points include disruption turning to damage (e.g., Qatar's LNG exports disrupted for 3-5 years) and attacks on infrastructure affecting commodities like aluminum, fertilizers, and helium.
Markets are underpricing the disruption: physical oil prices in Asia are 140-150, but futures are lower; equities still view the shock as transitory.
Policy flexibility is limited, with reduced ability for Fed or fiscal measures to bail out the economy as in the past.
The outlier scenario of $200 per barrel oil is moving closer as the war prolongs, increasing risks of infrastructure damage and longer-term shocks.