Trump criticizes UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer for offering to send aircraft carriers only after the conflict was won, not during, and for refusing to send minesweepers. He also extensively criticizes UK energy policy, specifically its reliance on wind power and failure to exploit North Sea oil, forcing it to buy oil expensively from Norway. The lack of timely support on security and adherence to what he views as a economically and strategically flawed energy policy demonstrates poor judgment and an unwillingness to act in mutual interest, damaging the special relationship. Under current leadership and policies, the UK is not a reliable or effective partner. The direction is AVOID due to strategic misalignment and poor policy outcomes (energy). A change in UK leadership or a dramatic shift in energy policy (e.g., embracing North Sea oil & gas) could restore the partnership's value.
Trump states windmills are "very bad environmentally," kill birds, are unsightly, noisy, expensive, and "don't work." He notes China manufactures them but uses coal, building new coal plants, while "foolish countries" like the UK deploy them. He frames wind energy as a costly, ineffective, and environmentally harmful technology pushed by environmentalists but avoided by pragmatic manufacturing nations, representing poor policy and investment. The sector is criticized as fundamentally flawed and a product of misguided ideology rather than sound economics or environmental science. The direction is AVOID. Major technological breakthroughs that drastically reduce cost, improve reliability, and mitigate environmental impacts could invalidate this view.