Orlando Bravo, a major private equity software investor, argues the current sell-off in public software stocks is a bifurcated story of warranted vs. unwarranted punishment.
Core thesis: AI will be a disruptive force for many public software companies, accelerating existing challenges and justifying recent valuation declines for some.
However, he contends other "phenomenal" public software businesses have been "severely punished" unjustly and will be big winners in the coming "agentic" AI era.
He contrasts this with his private portfolio of 77 companies, which he says are "crushing it," well-positioned for AI, and fundamentally different from the vulnerable public companies.
On valuations: Notes public software forward EBITDA multiples have compressed from ~22x to ~17x, which he still considers "very healthy levels" for achieving excellent returns.
States Thoma Bravo's private marks are not down by a similar magnitude (~25%) as the public S&P Software and Services Index, as they mark based on fundamentals, not just public comparables.
Dismisses concerns about private credit exposure to software affecting his firm, citing strong fundamentals and reassured LPs after a detailed portfolio review.
Implicitly responds to criticism from Apollo's John Zito about private equity marks by emphasizing his firm's long-term, fundamental approach and transparency with major institutional LPs.