Ideas
Quantum computing top; avoid frothy names.
Quantum computing reached a fever-pitch froth in October. Names such as Rigetti, IonQ, and D-Wave had risen from a few dollars to $40-$50 on hope for a far-off quantum future, but their revenues are only a few million dollars or less and the businesses are almost impossible to value. There were no true quantum leap advancements, so the collapse was sentiment reversing after an unsustainable move; these frothy quantum names should be avoided.
OKLO top; no revenue, impossible valuation.
OKLO in the SMR nuclear space had gone up at an unsustainable rate, similar to quantum. It has little or no revenue and no reliable way to value the business; the price is a total guess about whether SMR nuclear becomes meaningful in 5-15 years. That makes it a frothy name vulnerable to a top or collapse, so avoid it.
April crash already happened; no big crash.
The major correction or crash already happened in April during the tariff selloff, and the market has fully retraced. Since then the S&P 500 has been in a steady grind higher, staying near equilibrium rather than becoming euphoric or Bollinger-band overextended, and the April flush removed weak hands and leverage. Lance does not expect another big crash and says not to fight the steady-strong trend.
Big Tech not bubble; fundamentals real.
The AI boom in broad big tech is not a dot-com-style bubble. There are real fundamental use cases and spending: people use ChatGPT and Gemini daily, Nvidia chips are broadly used, and corporate investment, earnings, and productivity support the cycle. Froth has been isolated to speculative no-revenue areas like quantum, while the broader tech sector never became totally divorced from reality.
Nvidia not expensive; real AI use cases.
Nvidia is not a bubble; it may be called overvalued but that is a different argument. The company has real revenue and fundamental use cases, and its chips are in virtually everything, so it is not just hope-based like quantum. Lance also says Nvidia is not even that expensive.
MSTR should trade near Bitcoin NAV.
Strategy/MSTR is ultimately a Bitcoin holding company and should trade roughly around the net asset value of its Bitcoin. Its late-2024 premium was driven by retail euphoria and lack of easy Bitcoin alternatives, but Bitcoin ETFs and the company's own arbitrage, issuing overpriced debt and equity to buy Bitcoin, made premium compression inevitable. The underperformance versus Bitcoin is a rational reversion to NAV, not merely high beta, and the prior $400+ price was unjustified.
Bitcoin capitulation low likely holds near-term.
After Bitcoin fell from about $100,000 to $80,000 in just over a week, November 21 saw a high-volume overnight capitulation that flushed leveraged longs and pushed price far below the lower Bollinger Band. Lance became bullish and bought that capitulation as a swing trade, though he has since sold. He believes the November 21 low is likely to hold in the short-to-medium term and that Bitcoin will probably consolidate in a range through year-end.
Crypto treasury companies nonsensical; avoid theme.
The crypto treasury-company theme was nonsensical. Many companies raised and poured billions into Bitcoin and Ethereum, yet Bitcoin and Ethereum still showed relative weakness over the following months. The theme did not create durable value or support crypto prices, so avoid the crypto treasury-company basket.
This The David Lin Report video, published December 09, 2025,
features Lance Breitstein
discussing QUBT, RGTI, IONQ, QBTS, OKLO, SPY, XLK, NVDA, MSTR, BTC, Crypto treasury companies.
8 trade ideas extracted by AI with direction and confidence scoring.
Speakers:
Lance Breitstein
· Tickers:
QUBT,
RGTI,
IONQ,
QBTS,
OKLO,
SPY,
XLK,
NVDA,
MSTR,
BTC,
Crypto treasury companies