Even the EU Abruptly Cuts Off Huawei! Will Samsung Electronics Sweep Up Telecom Equipment Too? TSMC Monopoly Regulation Concerns—Will It Be a Heaven-Sent Opportunity for Samsung Electronics? | Analyst Lee Ju-wan

"EU마저 화웨이 전격 손절!" 삼성전자, 통신 장비까지 싹쓸이? TSMC 독과점 규제 우려, 삼성전자에 하늘이 준 기회 될까?ㅣ이주완 애널리스트
Watch on YouTube ↗  |  February 01, 2026 at 05:30  |  19:19  |  815 Money Talk (815머니톡)
Speakers
Lee Ju-wan — Industry Analyst
Hwang Yoo-hyun — Private Banker Team Lead, NH Investment & Securities

Summary

In this interview, industry analyst Lee Ju-wan discusses EU and US restrictions on Huawei and Chinese telecom equipment, the potential but gradual benefit for Samsung Electronics' telecom equipment business, and why Korean telecom equipment/component stocks remain unattractive. He also covers TSMC's antitrust risk, the limited significance of Europe for Korean semiconductor demand, the semiconductor tariff pass-through mechanism, and the greater tariff burden on Hyundai/Kia. The discussion also touches on AI data center capex cyclicality and memory demand resilience.

  • EU and US restrictions are pushing Huawei out of core telecom infrastructure.
  • Samsung Electronics could gain telecom equipment orders if Huawei is fully excluded, but carrier resistance makes the benefit gradual.
  • Korean telecom equipment/component stocks face weak domestic demand and cyclical capex, while AI/server and platform companies are better positioned.
  • TSMC's high market share creates antitrust and regulatory risk in the US and potentially Europe.
  • Europe is not a major market for Korean semiconductor exports; China remains the key demand driver.
  • Semiconductor tariffs are largely paid by US buyers, unlike autos where Hyundai/Kia bear the cost.
  • AI data center and related infrastructure capex is cyclical and may slow next year, while memory demand is seen as more steadily growing.
Ideas
Lee Ju-wan Industry Analyst 4:25
Samsung telecom equipment opportunity is gradual
EU and US moves to exclude Huawei from core telecom infrastructure could open more telecom-equipment opportunities for Samsung Electronics, because if Huawei is fully removed, Nokia and Ericsson alone cannot meet demand. However, carriers still prefer existing Huawei gear due to compatibility, cost, and switching risk, and full removal will not happen overnight, so the benefit is likely gradual and limited unless the hardline China policy continues over the medium to long term.
Lee Ju-wan Industry Analyst 7:09
AI and platform over telecom equipment
In the 5G-to-6G transition, telecom carriers are investing conservatively and focusing more on AI/server infrastructure than base-station competition. As a result, AI-related and platform companies should benefit more than Korean telecom base-station equipment/component stocks, which also face weak domestic demand, cyclical capex, and a market where only early leaders keep margins.
Lee Ju-wan Industry Analyst 7:09
AI and platform over telecom equipment
In the 5G-to-6G transition, telecom carriers are investing conservatively and focusing more on AI/server infrastructure than base-station competition. As a result, AI-related and platform companies should benefit more than Korean telecom base-station equipment/component stocks, which also face weak domestic demand, cyclical capex, and a market where only early leaders keep margins.
Lee Ju-wan Industry Analyst 10:47
Korea chip demand depends on China
Europe is not a major semiconductor market for Korean makers. Korean semiconductor demand is concentrated in China, Hong Kong, Singapore, Vietnam, and partly Taiwan; US demand mainly flows indirectly through Nvidia components. Therefore EU restrictions on Chinese chips are not a meaningful new market catalyst, and China's economic growth remains the more important driver for Korean semiconductor earnings.
Lee Ju-wan Industry Analyst 12:57
TSMC faces antitrust risk from dominance
TSMC's biggest vulnerability is its own high market share. Antitrust and competition scrutiny from the US and potentially Europe could become a major difficulty; the US may use antitrust as a bargaining chip to push TSMC into building more US fabs, and Europe may initiate its own action. This creates a regulatory risk overhang for TSMC.
Lee Ju-wan Industry Analyst 15:21
Hyundai and Kia bear tariff cost
If the US imposes auto tariffs, Hyundai Motor and Kia are more exposed than semiconductor exporters because they export to their own US sales subsidiaries, making the Korean parent the importer of record. The tariff burden therefore falls on Hyundai/Kia and cannot easily be passed to US buyers.
Lee Ju-wan Industry Analyst 15:39
Chip tariffs are paid by US buyers
Semiconductor tariffs should be less of a concern for semiconductor investors than auto tariffs because when chips are exported to the US, the US buyers/importers are the ones paying the duty, not Korean or Taiwanese suppliers. US big tech cannot easily force TSMC to absorb the tariff because they need the chips, so tariff headlines are not a major risk for semiconductor fundamentals.
Up Next

This 815 Money Talk (815머니톡) video, published February 01, 2026, features Lee Ju-wan discussing 005930.KS, AI-SECTOR, Korean telecom equipment/component stocks, Korean semiconductor sector, TSM, 005380.KS, 000270.KS, SMH. 7 trade ideas extracted by AI with direction and confidence scoring.

Speakers: Lee Ju-wan  · Tickers: 005930.KS, AI-SECTOR, Korean telecom equipment/component stocks, Korean semiconductor sector, TSM, 005380.KS, 000270.KS, SMH