ARCH Arch Resources, Inc. : Bullish and Bearish Analyst Opinions

Gave argues the only way for the US to compete with China's industrial base is to lower electricity costs rapidly, likely by burning coal. He suggests watching US coal stocks: "If the US coal stocks start... really ripping... that will be a sign." Environmental dogmas are shifting due to economic necessity. If the US pivots to "cheap energy" over "green energy" to re-industrialize, domestic coal producers will see volume and multiple expansion, similar to the recent gold miner rally. WATCH/LONG US Coal producers as a proxy for US industrial policy shifts. US policy remains strictly ESG-focused; natural gas prices remain too low to justify coal switch.

Leavitt explicitly stated, "Coal truly keeps the lights on in this country," and mentioned the President's push for "more fossil fuels" and the "drill baby drill agenda." The administration is actively removing regulatory hurdles (EPA repeals) and offering rhetorical and policy support to the coal industry, contrary to the global transition narrative. This extends the lifespan and profitability of US coal assets. LONG US coal producers as regulatory pressure eases and baseload power demand is prioritized. Global demand drops or natural gas becomes significantly cheaper, displacing coal despite policy support.

"I'm directing the Department of Energy to issue funds to coal plants... to keep them online... I will sign an executive order that directs the Department of War to work directly with coal plants on the new power purchasing agreements." The federal government is shifting from a regulator to a guaranteed customer and subsidizer of the coal industry. By mandating the military (Department of War) to buy coal power and issuing direct funds to prevent closures, the terminal value risk of these companies is removed, and cash flows are government-backed. Peabody (BTU) was explicitly named and honored. LONG US coal producers as beneficiaries of direct state support and military contracts. Reversal of executive orders by courts or future administrations; global pricing pressures on thermal coal.

Burgum states "Coal was the hero" during recent storms and explicitly mentions the "reversal of the endangerment finding," calling EPA regulations a "massive overreach." The "Endangerment Finding" is the legal bedrock for EPA CO2 regulations. Reversing it or rolling back these rules halts the forced retirement of coal plants. If plants stay open longer to provide baseload power for AI/Data Centers, the terminal value of US coal producers (Peabody, Arch, Consol) re-rates significantly higher. LONG. The sector is priced for liquidation; policy shifts it to "cash cow" status. Utilities may still retire plants due to ESG mandates or cheaper natural gas, regardless of federal permission to keep them open.

The President is hosting an event to "tout clean, beautiful coal" and will formalize the rescission of the 2009 Obama-era endangerment finding. The "endangerment finding" was the legal bedrock for EPA regulation of CO2. Rescinding it removes the primary regulatory risk overhang for US coal producers. Furthermore, the administration is explicitly marketing coal as the solution to grid reliability issues during winter storms. LONG US Coal producers. They are likely trading at low multiples due to terminal value risks that are now being legislatively delayed or removed. Legal challenges from environmental groups could stall the rescission in courts.