The author directly challenges B. Riley's structural bear case, noting that management sees demand exceeding capacity for the 800G/1.6T ramp and calling the conclusion 'too absolute', which suggests p
The author directly challenges B. Riley's structural bear case, noting that management sees demand exceeding capacity for the 800G/1.6T ramp and calling the conclusion 'too absolute', which suggests potential upside if the architectural shift thesis is weaker than assumed.
Risk: The architectural shift (RNG/MRC) is real and could still reduce long-term transceiver demand; B. Riley's price target of $129 reflects a clear downside scenario.