I spoke to Mitch McConnell. He told me to buy $open right now

The new law is being treated by tradertards as either: housing bill = all housing stocks moon or corporate ownership ban = all housing stocks crater this is a garbage read The law generally blocks large institutional investors controlling at least 350 single-family homes from acquiring more. But it expressly exempts homes that are newly constructed, renovated or converted for sale and not rented while awaiting sale. Homes acquired through an exempt purchase are also excluded from the 350-home calculation. The restriction does not begin operating until 180 days after enactment. This is basically a carveout for the $OPEN business model this exemption is basically the best thing to happen to $OPEN since god invented houses Opendoor is not primarily trying to accumulate a permanent rental empire. It turns inventory. Congress has just restricted the rent-and-hold institutions competing for houses while preserving a statutory lane for companies that renovate homes and return them to the for-sale market. At minimum, this kills one of the cleanest regulatory bear cases against $OPEN; at best, it creates a relative advantage over institutional buyers that don’t fit an exemption. The business is already turning even without this bill, i'm still bullish on $OPEN. Despite how awful their Q1 numbers looked, other operating indicators are very strong Homes purchased rose 45% quarter-over-quarter. It signed more than 5k acquisition contracts, double Q4 and the highest level since 2022. Homes sitting on the market longer than 120 days fell from 33% to 10% QOQ. Contribution margin improved every month from September through March. Recent acquisition cohorts were selling faster than any comparable cohort since the COVID period. Fixed operating expenses fell from $39 million to $33 million YOY. Management guided for approximately 25% sequential revenue growth in Q2, a contribution margin around the middle of its target range, and adjusted EBITDA around breakeven. It is targeting positive adjusted net income on a twelve-month forward basis by the end of 26. my bet is: $OPEN is rebuilding profitable unit economics before housing activity has even recovered, positioning them perfectly for a modest thaw in transaction volumes. June existing-home sales fell to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of approximately 4.09 million while mortgage rates and record home prices continued suppressing activity. If the thaw happens, they have serious operating leverage. Upside? i think the market is still pricing $OPEN like theyre lighting money on fire buying housing the econchad case is that theyre building something better (a scaled residential transaction platform with better inventory selection and faster turnover and improving contribution margins with a cost base that does not need to rise proportionally with volume compounded with a federal policy regime that restricts long-term institutional accumulation while explicitly allowing renovated homes intended for resale) This housing bill does not have a "$OPEN will explode now 600%" provision. it will not instantly lower mortgage rates. Further, some build-to-rent and renovate-to-rent deals are exempt too. All It does is add narrative fuel on top of an operating turnaround. The truecel path is: Ppl realise the institutional-buyer restrictions are not automatically hostile to OPEN. Q2 confirms revenue acceleration and adjusted EBITDA breakeven. Better cohorts prove margins remain intact as acquisitions scale. Housing transactions eventually recover. $OPEN gets rerated from “chud home flipper” to “technology-enabled chad housing liquidity platform.” we dont need another 2021 housing bubble. We just need management to hit its Q2 guide and demonstrate that improved margins survive higher volume. Monday Moonday: Monday will probably not be a gap day. Congress had already passed the bill and im pretty sure the enrolled text was publically avalible. But weekend headlines have given ppl a chance to read about the resale carve out which will be a powerful catalyst. If substantial volume arrives, this is exactly the type of volatile retail ticker where a fundamental catalyst can become reflexive very quickly. **My position:** https://preview.redd.it/zr9qnroakwch1.png?width=896&format=png&auto=webp&s=0df41713b42a17fee245a4596ad6a29c36096b68 i know its small, its unironically most of my portfolio im very broke The bear case: there is none (ok technically the carve-out could be implemented more narrowly than bulls expect. Mortgage rates could remain elevated. Housing turnover could remain frozen. $OPEN could misprice inventory, suffer write-downs or miss its Q2 margin targets but thats not gonna happen) tldr: Congress restricted corporate landlords but expressly preserved a lane for homes renovated and resold. That resembles the $OPEN model. Plus, the $OPEN acquisition volume, inventory age, margins and resale velocity are already improving, with adjusted EBITDA breakeven guided for Q2. If the operational turnaround holds and the market recognises the potential regulatory advantage, the stock does not need much housing recovery to reprice aggressively.