META PE lower than McDonald's, Proctor & Gamble

FourCrossedWands · 2026-06-17T17:25:53+00:00

=== SUMMARY === - The post compares META's P/E of 21 to McDonald's and Procter & Gamble's P/E of 23, arguing META is undervalued relative to "old dying companies" with no future. - The author asks whether META is a buy or could drop further, implying a potential value opportunity but seeking validation. - Quality assessment: Speculation based on a simple P/E comparison; lacks analysis of cash flows, capital spending, or growth sustainability. Not well-researched DD. === SENTIMENT === MIXED === TRADE IDEAS === TICKER - DIRECTION | confidence: 0.50 | sentiment: +0.30 Speaker: u/FourCrossedWands Thesis: 1. THE FACT: META's P/E of 21 is lower than MCD (23) and PG (23), despite META having growing earnings and AI/future growth potential. 2. THE BRIDGE: The valuation gap may present a buying opportunity if the market is over-discounting META's heavy capex (Metaverse, AI) relative to stagnant consumer staples. 3. THE VERDICT: Long META based on relative value, but with caution due to high spending and uncertain monetization of AI investments. 4. RISKS: Metaverse losses persist; AI spending fails to generate returns; regulatory headwinds; further multiple compression; community sentiment is bearish. Timeframe: medium-term Key Points: - META PE lower than MCD/PG - Growing earnings vs stagnant peers - Market discounts heavy capex - AI monetization uncertain - Community sentiment bearish === COMMENTS SUMMARY === Top comments are largely bearish: one notes Meta would be 2x price without poor strategic bets, another highlights heavy spending not reflected in earnings, and a third suggests Microsoft (MSFT) as a better value. A user with a large position expresses frustration, while another jokes about buying at the peak. The community counters the simple P/E comparison by emphasizing META's capital expenditure risks and questionable AI returns.

u/FourCrossedWands · Reddit — r/ValueInvesting · June 17, 2026 at 17:25 · ⬆ 36 pts · 💬 90 comments | View on Reddit ↗

AI Summary

Summary

The post compares META's P/E of 21 to McDonald's and Procter & Gamble's P/E of 23, arguing META is undervalued relative to "old dying companies" with no future.
The author asks whether META is a buy or could drop further, implying a potential value opportunity but seeking validation.
Quality assessment: Speculation based on a simple P/E comparison; lacks analysis of cash flows, capital spending, or growth sustainability. Not well-researched DD.

Score 36

Comments 90

Upvote % 82%

More from Reddit — r/ValueInvesting

Where to find value when everything has had a bull run?

Jun 17, 16:30

Oracle's numbers are insane but the stock just won't stop falling. Down 25% in two weeks.

Jun 17, 15:23

BMW is why you do not buy cyclical businesses at low PEs

Jun 17, 14:55

How This Old-School Value Fund With No Tech Stocks Is Beating the Market - Barron’s

Jun 17, 10:42

How do you monitor whether your investment thesis is still valid after buying a stock?

Jun 17, 04:50

META PE lower than McDonald's, Proctor &amp; Gamble

Summary

More from Reddit — r/ValueInvesting

META PE lower than McDonald's, Proctor & Gamble