SpaceX IPO on 12th June ($SPCX) - here's why I'm not buying
u/ValueEquities ·
Reddit — r/ValueInvesting
· June 10, 2026 at 15:36
· ⬆ 16 pts
· 💬 15 comments
| View on Reddit ↗
AI Summary
Summary
The author analyzes SpaceX's S-1 ahead of its IPO, arguing that the $1.75T valuation is unjustified despite Starlink's strong fundamentals.
Key concerns: extreme valuation multiple (~266× EBITDA), massive losses from xAI ($6.35B operating loss in Q1 2026 alone), falling Starlink ARPU (from $99 to $66), $29B debt, and 85% voting control by Elon Musk.
The post is well-researched DD, citing specific financial data from the S-1 and comparing multiples to big tech peers. Quality: high.
Score16
Comments15
Upvote %80%
▶ Full Post Text
I spent two weeks reading the SpaceX S-1.
And I'm not buying the IPO tomorrow.
Let me be clear upfront: Starlink is one of the best businesses I've analyzed in years.
39% operating margins. 63% EBITDA margins. 50% revenue growth.
If Starlink were its own public company, I'd probably be writing a very different post.
The valuation timeline is what bothers me.
• $350B in May 2025
• $800B in December 2025
• $1.25T after the xAI merger
• $1.75T at IPO
That's a 5× increase in twelve months.
The election. The merger. The IPO announcement.
Each added hundreds of billions in value, yet none were driven by a major improvement in the core business.
Then there's the merger.
Before xAI, SpaceX earned $791M in net income during 2024.
After the merger:
• 2025 net loss: $4.9B
• Q1 2026 net loss: $4.3B
One quarter nearly matched the entire prior year's loss.
The segment breakdown is even more striking.
• Starlink operating profit: +$4.42B
• AI segment operating loss: -$6.35B
One business is carrying the company.
Another is consuming cash at an extraordinary rate.
xAI generated $3.2B in revenue but burned roughly $14B in cash.
AI capex reached $7.7B in Q1 2026 alone.
The company also carries $29B of long-term debt, and the S-1 suggests additional capital raises are likely.
One detail I haven't seen discussed enough:
Starlink ARPU fell from roughly $99/month in 2023 to about $66/month today.
That's a 33% decline.
More subscribers. Less revenue per subscriber.
Now consider valuation.
Meta: \~22× EBITDA
Alphabet: \~18× EBITDA
Microsoft: \~28× EBITDA
SpaceX IPO: \~266× EBITDA
For that multiple to work, investors need:
1. Starship to achieve sustained operational cadence
2. xAI to become a highly profitable business
3. Terafab to succeed despite having no binding agreements today
All three....At the same time.
Two other things worth knowing:
• Elon Musk controls 85% of voting rights through super-voting shares
• Retail investors are receiving roughly 30% of the float versus \~10% for a typical mega-cap IPO
I'm not arguing the company fails....The bull case is real.
But at $1.75T, investors are paying a premium price today for outcomes that still need to be proven....
SpaceX IPO at $1.75T implies ~266× EBITDA, while comparable tech firms trade at 18-28×. The company posted a net loss of $4.9B in 2025 and $4.3B in Q1 2026 due to xAI losses. The extreme valuation requires simultaneous success of Starship, xAI, and Terafab — all unproven. Retail investors get a larger than normal share of the float (30%), suggesting potential for a volatile initial pop followed by downside. Avoid the IPO outright. The risk/reward is poor at this price; wait for a better entry after the hype fades or fundamentals improve. If Starship achieves rapid cadence or xAI turns profitable sooner than expected, the valuation could be justified. Elon’s control may limit institutional influence but also prevent a takeover premium.
This Reddit post, published June 10, 2026,
features u/ValueEquities
discussing SPCX.
1 trade idea extracted by AI with direction and confidence scoring.