META lays off thousands for AI and nobody wants to discuss the obvious next problem

Meta reportedly plans to cut thousands of jobs while shifting billions toward AI infrastructure. And I keep thinking about this more than I probably should. Because at some point someone has to ask the question nobody seems comfortable asking out loud: if AI displaces enough workers across enough industries, where does consumer demand actually come from? Like… who's buying things? People throw around "UBI is coming" like it's a fun thought experiment, but I don't think they've sat with the actual math. Governmemts are already buried in debt. Tax revenues tied to labor would shrink at the exact moment you'd need to financially support millions of people who no longer have jobs. That's not a policy problem. That's a structural contradiction. And I don't have a clean answer for what comes next. More money printing? Some kind of corporate AI tax? Permanent stimulus that slowly stops feeling like stimulus and just becomes the baseline? I genuinely don't know, and I'm skeptical of anyone who says they do. What bothers me most is that the market keeps cheering, productivity goes vertical, margins expand, investors are happy, at least, those bought in AI stocks,. But that math only works while people still have income to spend. The moment that breaks down, the whole thing looks very different in hindsight. Maybe nothing dramatic happens. Maybe the transition is slow enough that societies adapt. But we're clearly accelerating toward something, and it doesn't feel like anyone in a position to actually shape this is taking it seriously enough. That part worries me more than the layoffs themselves.