u/TabMan69 ·
Reddit — r/ValueInvesting
· April 01, 2026 at 02:32
· ⬆ 15 pts
· 💬 28 comments
| View on Reddit ↗
AI Summary
Summary
The post analyzes Adobe (ADBE) following its Q1 FY2026 earnings report, arguing that the market's bearish "seat-count" narrative is flawed.
The author's thesis is that declining user seats are more than offset by accelerating ARPU growth, driven by high consumption of AI credits (Firefly), making the stock undervalued.
Quality assessment: Well-researched DD. The author uses primary financial data (EPS, RPO, Firefly ARR), provides a clear quantitative model (ARPU vs. seat erosion break-evens), and defines specific future conditions to validate the thesis.
Score15
Comments28
Upvote %80%
▶ Full Post Text
I wrote up a primary source thesis on Adobe ($ADBE). Short version:
Adobe reported Q1 FY2026 on March 12. EPS $6.06 vs $5.87 estimate. RPO $22.22B growing 12.8% YoY. Firefly ARR crossed $250M at 75% QoQ growth. Guidance reaffirmed in full. Stock fell 7.59%.
The market is applying a seat-count framework to a business whose reported numbers show consumption acceleration. Those are two different models of the same company.
Three reasons the multiple is where it's at:
* Cohort drag: IGV ETF declined \~30% from its September 2025 peak, and Adobe sold with the category regardless of fundamentals
* AI displacement narrative: the market assumes fewer seats equals less revenue, reported numbers show the opposite mechanic
* CEO uncertainty: Narayen's departure was announced on the same call, guidance reset risk sits in the multiple until a successor speaks
The bear case and the bull case are the same mechanism. Fewer seats × higher Firefly credit consumption per remaining seat = ARPU (average revenue per user) expansion. At 20% annual ARPU growth, seat erosion must exceed 17% annually before net Creative revenue declines. At 50% growth, the break-even is 33% erosion. Q1 credit consumption was running at 45% QoQ.
Next gate: Q2 earnings June 11. Two conditions, both required: RPO ≥10% YoY and Firefly ARR QoQ ≥30%. Full write-up with crossover math, comp table, and break conditions here: [https://darrenleung1.substack.com/p/adbe-the-bear-case-accelerates-the](https://darrenleung1.substack.com/p/adbe-the-bear-case-accelerates-the)
Happy to get pushback on the ARPU growth assumption or the agentic credit consumption argument.
Reported financials (EPS beat, 12.8% RPO growth, 75% QoQ Firefly ARR growth) contradict the bearish narrative of AI displacement causing revenue decline. The market is mispricing ADBE due to cohort drag, an AI displacement narrative, and CEO transition uncertainty, creating a valuation opportunity. ARPU expansion from Firefly credit consumption can outpace seat erosion, leading to net revenue growth. The stock's decline post-earning is an overreaction. Failure to meet the author's Q2 conditions (RPO growth ≥10% YoY, Firefly ARR QoQ growth ≥30%); a faster-than-modeled seat decline; execution risk during CEO transition.