A Star Investor's Tale of Risk, Ruin & Reinvention w/ Victor Haghani (RWH071)

Watch on YouTube ↗  |  August 09, 2026 at 00:00  |  1:56:35  |  We Study Billionaires
Speakers
Victor Haghani — Professor of Finance, Fordham University

Summary

William Green interviews Victor Haghani, former LTCM partner and now founder of Elm Wealth, about his journey from spectacular success and failure to building a disciplined, low-cost wealth management firm. Haghani explains how the collapse of LTCM taught him to frame decisions through expected utility rather than expected wealth, and why he now favors a dynamic index-based asset allocation. He provides specific current positioning from his ELM ETF, underweight US equities and overweight non-US equities and TIPS, and argues against private equity, hedge funds, and factor strategies for individual investors.

  • Haghani traces his formative experiences from Salomon Brothers' arbitrage desk to co-founding Long-Term Capital Management.
  • He contends LTCM's leverage was not excessive for an institutional fund, but his personal 80% allocation was the real mistake.
  • The concept of maximizing expected utility—not expected wealth—is the core framework for sizing risk in personal finance.
  • After leaving LTCM, he abandoned private equity and hedge funds due to tax inefficiency and high fees, embracing broad indexing.
  • He developed a dynamic asset allocation approach that adjusts equity exposure based on long-term valuations and momentum-based risk signals.
  • The ELM ETF (ticker ELM) currently runs underweight US equities, overweight non-US equities, and overweight Treasury bills and TIPS.
  • Haghani rejects factor tilting (value, size, momentum) as not worth the extra costs, risk, and behavioral pitfalls for most investors.
  • He emphasizes resilience: time heals most wounds, and a long-term perspective helps investors survive market turmoil.
Ideas
Victor Haghani Professor of Finance, Fordham University 77:19
Private equity, hedge funds too tax inefficient.
For a US individual taxable investor, private equity, hedge funds and other alternative investments are highly tax-inefficient, involve layers of fees that are difficult to overcome, and impose a heavy administrative burden. After realizing this around 2006-2007, Haghani stopped investing in them altogether and moved to a simple, broad-market index approach.
Victor Haghani Professor of Finance, Fordham University 84:47
High real yields make TIPS attractive.
With the low equity risk premium currently on offer, it makes sense to increase the allocation to safe assets. TIPS real yields have moved from -1% to 2.5%, providing attractive guaranteed real returns. Elm’s portfolios are therefore overweight fixed income, mostly in Treasury bills and TIPS, as a prudent response to the compressed reward for equity risk.
Victor Haghani Professor of Finance, Fordham University 93:12
Dynamic allocation ETF improves on static indexing.
The ELM ETF (ticker ELM) offers a low-cost, rules-based dynamic asset allocation strategy that adjusts exposure to equity markets based on long-term expected returns (using CAPE) and a trailing momentum risk proxy. This approach aims to improve risk-adjusted outcomes compared with a static index allocation, without resorting to short-term market timing. The total expense ratio is only about 0.24%.
Victor Haghani Professor of Finance, Fordham University 94:21
US equities overvalued; non-US equities cheaper.
US equities currently offer a low expected return relative to safe assets. The cyclically adjusted earnings yield is only about 3.25%, while 10-year TIPS yield roughly 2.25%, giving an equity risk premium of only about 1%. In contrast, non-US equities have higher earnings yields and lower P/E ratios, making them relatively more attractive on a long-term valuation basis.
Victor Haghani Professor of Finance, Fordham University 94:21
US equities overvalued; non-US equities cheaper.
US equities currently offer a low expected return relative to safe assets. The cyclically adjusted earnings yield is only about 3.25%, while 10-year TIPS yield roughly 2.25%, giving an equity risk premium of only about 1%. In contrast, non-US equities have higher earnings yields and lower P/E ratios, making them relatively more attractive on a long-term valuation basis.
Victor Haghani Professor of Finance, Fordham University 99:56
Factor strategies not worth extra risk, cost.
Factor-tilted strategies (value, size, momentum, etc.) are zero-sum, carry higher fees and turnover, increase portfolio risk relative to the market, and often lead investors to abandon them during prolonged underperformance. Taking all these costs and behavioral risks into account, Haghani concludes they are not worth the added complexity and keeps Elm’s portfolios simple and broadly diversified.
Up Next

This We Study Billionaires video, published August 09, 2026, features Victor Haghani discussing PSP, Hedge funds, BIL, TIP, ELM, SPY, non-US equities, Factor-based strategies. 6 trade ideas extracted by AI with direction and confidence scoring.

Speakers: Victor Haghani  · Tickers: PSP, Hedge funds, BIL, TIP, ELM, SPY, non-US equities, Factor-based strategies