President Trump explicitly conditions a ceasefire with Iran on the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, threatening continued military action.
Market volatility occurred due to conflicting U.S. signals, with whipsawing reactions to presidential statements.
Iranian President Mahsud Peshkow has very limited influence over war decisions; his role is focused on domestic economic policy.
U.S. policy inconsistency is evident: Monday threatened destruction of Iranian oil and electric infrastructure, Tuesday hinted at withdrawal, Wednesday reverted to a强硬 stance linking ceasefire to the Strait.
Analysts and investors consistently view free trade through the Strait of Hormuz as a non-negotiable prerequisite for ending the conflict, deeming alternatives infeasible.
The Strait of Hormuz's closure is a persistent geopolitical risk driver, directly impacting global oil trade and market sentiment.
Key uncertainty revolves around the U.S. administration's true commitment and consistency regarding preconditions for ceasefire.
Market implication: Oil prices and energy-related assets remain highly sensitive to developments in the region, with the Strait's status as a central focus.