Is Russia Actually Losing?

Watch on YouTube ↗  |  July 11, 2026 at 12:30  |  35:28  |  Patrick Boyle
Speakers
Patrick Boyle — Host / Hedge Fund Manager and Finance Professor

Summary

Patrick Boyle examines whether Russia is losing the war economically, focusing on Ukraine's drone campaign against Russian oil refineries, fuel rationing, Crimea's state of emergency, and Russia's depleted fiscal buffers. He argues Russia's war economy is structurally exhausted, with a contracting economy, a blown budget deficit, and a banking system commandeered to fund military-linked firms. The video also analyzes China's lopsided leverage over Russia and Europe's post-Cold War rearmament, including why defense stocks underperformed despite higher spending and how Europe may shift toward local low-cost weapons.

  • Ukraine's drone strikes have knocked out roughly a third of Russia's oil refining capacity, causing diesel export bans, gasoline imports, and fuel rationing.
  • Russia's National Wealth Fund has fallen from 6.5% to 1.8% of GDP, and the first-quarter 2026 budget deficit exceeded the full-year target.
  • Russian corporate debt and problem loans are rising as state banks direct cheap credit to military-related firms.
  • China's trade share with Russia has risen to about 35%, giving Beijing leverage and discounted raw materials.
  • Europe is undertaking its largest rearmament since the Cold War, led by Germany's €800 billion borrowing plan.
  • Defense stocks underperformed in March 2026 despite rearmament, as conflict premium was already priced in and production cycles are long.
  • Europe is increasingly concerned about dependence on US weapons and may favor local low-cost drones and missiles.
  • The video concludes Russia's economy is structurally exhausted, not collapsing on a fixed schedule.
Ideas
Patrick Boyle Host / Hedge Fund Manager and Finance Professor 23:55
Defense stocks already priced for war.
Despite Europe's largest rearmament since the Cold War, the NYSE Arca Defense Index fell nearly 8% in March 2026 while the S&P 500 fell about 5%, underperforming because much of the conflict premium was already baked into valuations after the index climbed more than 150% from 2020 to 2025. Modern defense manufacturing also runs on long production cycles, so rearmament spending cannot quickly convert into higher output. Investors should monitor defense stocks rather than assume European rearmament automatically lifts them.
Patrick Boyle Host / Hedge Fund Manager and Finance Professor 24:51
Europe shifts from US to local.
Europe's rearmament is shifting away from expensive American weapons toward local low-cost systems. European officials worry about dependence on US high-tech weapons, potential kill switches, and transactional US alliances, making US jets and systems look like a cancelable subscription. Europe wants to copy Ukraine's agile, low-cost manufacturing and build a decentralized porcupine defense; Ukraine's Flamingo cruise missile costs about $500,000 each with double the range of a Tomahawk, and German defense firm Diehl is in talks to build it in Germany. This is negative for US defense contractors and positive for European defense manufacturers focused on cheap drones and missiles.
Up Next

This Patrick Boyle video, published July 11, 2026, features Patrick Boyle discussing ITA, EUAD. 2 trade ideas extracted by AI with direction and confidence scoring.

Speakers: Patrick Boyle  · Tickers: ITA, EUAD