The AI revolution is drawing comparisons to the 1990s Internet boom, but the macro context is fundamentally different and critical to outcomes.
Chris Anstey argues technological revolutions do not occur in a vacuum; the wider macro environment is as important as the technology itself.
In the 1990s, the Internet-driven productivity surge was accompanied by globalization, specifically China's integration into global supply chains, which aided disinflation.
The president's economic team (e.g., Scott Bessent, Kevin Hassett) focuses on AI's potential productivity boost without inflation, mirroring the 1990s, but omits other key factors like globalization.
Allen Greenspan was prescient in recognizing 1990s productivity gains early, allowing the Fed to keep interest rates low and sustain growth.
Other 1990s dynamics included fiscal contraction and borrowing conditions that enabled private sector investment without higher long-term rates.
A personal anecdote underscores the significant role of declining Chinese import prices in 1990s disinflation, a factor missing from current comparisons.
The implication is that for AI to replicate 1990s-style growth without inflation, favorable macro conditions must align, which may not be present today.
Key disagreement: The president's team is overly optimistic about AI's isolated impact, neglecting broader macro headwinds.
Important uncertainty: Whether current macro policies can support AI-driven productivity gains without triggering inflationary pressures or labor market disruptions.