Commercial space launch providers Loading... : Investor Sentiment and Bull/Bear Views
Loading chart...
Top Calls
No data yet
Price change since each call, adjusted for long/short direction. Results calculated:
Feed
18:14
Jun 04
Jun 04
NASA money shifts to commercial launch providers.
Isaacman argues NASA must stop competing with private industry and redirect money toward commercial providers. SLS is repurposed shuttle hardware costing about $4.5 billion a launch, and he says senators from SLS states now privately accept that 60-year-old technology at that price has an expiration date, so the political winds are finally shifting even if the government turns like a shipping container. His plan is to fly the already paid-for hardware, check the moon box ahead of China, and then lean on commercial rapid reusable heavy lift while NASA concentrates on what no company would do. He points out NASA's own foresight created the commercial crew program that let him fly, and he is explicitly enthusiastic about the vehicles and investments coming from the commercial industry, naming Rocket Lab alongside SpaceX, Blue Origin and Firefly, saying that once those vehicles work the US gets cheap optionality to reach the moon or Mars.
MED
About Commercial space launch providers Investor Commentary
Across the available history and selected sources, Buzzberg tracks Commercial space launch providers across 1 sources: 1 bullish vs 0 bearish calls from 1 authors. Historical directional balance: 100% = 100 × (bullish − bearish) / all deduplicated idea records, including other directions. This is neither a probability of a price rise nor the share of bullish authors. 1 total trade idea tracked. Latest voices: Jared Isaacman.