Climate-exposed coastal real estate Loading... : Investor Sentiment and Bull/Bear Views
Loading chart...
Top Calls
No data yet
Price change since each call, adjusted for long/short direction. Results calculated:
Feed
02:08
Jan 11
Jan 11
Regulated insurance masks risk in coastal homes
Property in climate-sensitive zones on the California and Florida coasts is still priced as if the chance of a total loss were one in a thousand years, while catastrophe models now imply something closer to one in twenty. State insurance commissioners cap what carriers may charge, so instead of repricing, carriers exit: State Farm cancelled 1,600 Palisades fire policies months before the fire, and carriers have been pulling out of California, Tahoe and wine country. The state's own FAIR plan has roughly $120 million of capital plus about $5 billion of reinsurance against roughly $6 billion of exposure in Pacific Palisades alone, so it is effectively bankrupt. Suppressed insurance costs have artificially propped up real-estate values; the cost of the higher loss probability must ultimately be eaten by homeowners through write-downs, by insurers, or by taxpayers via a state or federal bailout, and he expects taxpayer backlash and legislative change once the bill comes due.
HIGH
About Climate-exposed coastal real estate Investor Commentary
Across the available history and selected sources, Buzzberg tracks Climate-exposed coastal real estate across 1 sources: 0 bullish vs 0 bearish calls from 1 authors. Historical directional balance: 0% = 100 × (bullish − bearish) / all deduplicated idea records, including other directions. This is neither a probability of a price rise nor the share of bullish authors. 1 total trade idea tracked. Latest voices: David Friedberg.