Titus argues that gaming regulation should remain "state by state" and that operators must "follow the rules of the states where they're already established." She dismisses the CFTC's ability to regulate gaming. By fighting to keep regulation at the state level and attacking "prediction markets," Titus is effectively defending the regulatory moat of incumbent, licensed sportsbooks. High barriers to entry (state licensing) favor established players like DraftKings over new, agile prediction market competitors. Long regulated sportsbooks as political figures move to crush their lower-cost, unregulated competition. Prediction markets gain legal status as "event contracts" under the CFTC, bypassing state gaming commissions.