The options were fairly priced rather than expensive, and the basis risk was too high to justify the trade.
"We came close to selling put spreads on... Korean equities (EWY)... The basis risk (oil up, ags flat) was enough to walk away."
TLDR
The author outlines a 'cascade trade' strategy designed to profit from potential geopolitical escalation while hedging against a sudden peace resolution. The core thesis is that while direct oil impacts are mostly priced in, secondary agricultural shocks (fertilizer shortages, ethanol demand) remain unpriced and offer asymmetric upside.
• Peace is linear and mostly priced by the market, while war is exponential and priced with a lag.
• Direct oil trades are crowded and mostly priced in, though US LNG and pipeline infrastructure remain structurally advantaged.
• The primary opportunity lies in the 'cascade' effects on agriculture: nitrogen fertilizer shortages hitting corn, ethanol demand pulling sugar, and wheat acting as a panic premium.
• The author is long a basket of corn, wheat, and sugar call options to capture these unpriced secondary shocks.
• To hedge against a sudden peace resolution, the author is buying front-end rate options (Schatz calls, IEI), betting that central banks will ease if the energy shock dissipates.
March 31, 2026 at 04:23