Google's latest creation: Gemini 3.5 Flash. Puts.

=== SUMMARY === - Post shares links showing Google's Gemini 3.5 Flash incorrectly adding 300+140 as 460, implying the AI model has a basic math hallucination. - Author sarcastically calls this "SOTA performance" and explicitly says "Puts," making a bearish call on Google based on AI quality failures. - Quality assessment: Noise / sentiment-driven speculation, not well-researched DD — single anecdotal test, no financial data, but a clear directional thesis. === SENTIMENT === BEARISH === TRADE IDEAS === TICKER - DIRECTION | confidence: 0.50 | sentiment: -0.40 Speaker: u/SuggestionMission516 Thesis: 1. THE FACT: Google’s Gemini 3.5 Flash fails a trivial arithmetic check (300+140), highlighting poor reasoning reliability. 2. THE BRIDGE: Continued AI quality issues undermine competitive positioning versus rivals (Claude, Grok) and could erode cloud/AI revenue growth expectations. 3. THE VERDICT: Short GOOGL on the thesis that market perception of Google’s AI leadership is overblown and will correct as more similar flaws surface. 4. RISKS: Single test may be cherry-picked; other models also hallucinate; Google’s AI revenue is diversified and not solely dependent on flashy demos. Timeframe: short-term Key Points: - Gemini model math error revealed - "Puts" signal from author - Competition may benefit from Google slip - Community shows mixed replication - Short-term sentiment trade, not fundamental === COMMENTS SUMMARY === Top comment (+107) posted an image confirming the hallucination with "Confirmed... What the fuck", supporting the bearish view. However, another comment (+18) shows a user who did *not* replicate the error, suggesting inconsistency. Additional remarks critique Gemini’s restrictive usage limits and the broader failure of LLMs to use a calculator, but no counter-arguments defend Google’s stock or financials directly.