Why Bitcoin BIP-110 failed - ft Giacomo Zucco

Gareth Jensen interviews Plan B Forum director Giacomo Zucco about the failed BIP 110 fork and what it reveals about Bitcoin governance, spam debates, and network resilience. Zucco argues the fork stalled because it bundled unrelated social and technical grievances, and its failed proof-of-work rebootstrap shows Bitcoin's immaculate conception cannot be easily reproduced. He also discusses the removal of Luke Dashjr as BIP editor and why Bitcoin Core's importance may fade over time. The episode opens with news on Harmony's exploit, SEC crypto regulation, Bitcoin treasury losses, Robinhood chain metrics, and the Coldcard wallet exploit. - BIP 110 activated but stalled after two blocks, later reaching four blocks on the stale branch. - Zucco breaks down four disputes conflated in BIP 110: spam philosophy, Core governance, node/miner governance, and CSAM emergency framing. - He says the failed proof-of-work rebootstrap demonstrates Bitcoin's immaculate conception is nearly impossible to reproduce. - Zucco calls Luke Dashjr's removal as BIP editor wrong and politically naive, though he expects Bitcoin Core's relevance to decline. - He is positive on Ocean's survival and growth after the debate. - News includes Harmony ONE exploit, SEC crypto asset rule proposal, 21 Capital Bitcoin treasury loss, Robinhood chain growth concentration, and Coldcard wallet exploit.