Cook: Iran Talks May Go in Circles

Steven Cook analyzes US-Iran negotiations, highlighting deep disagreements over the Strait of Hormuz and Iran's nuclear program. He sees little chance for a breakthrough, expects continued violence in the strait, and is skeptical that the Israel-Lebanon ceasefire will be implemented. Cook also discusses the two-track Trump administration diplomacy, with a lopsided MOU favoring Iran and a more traditional Rubio-led Lebanon track. - US and Iran remain far apart on key issues: Strait of Hormuz transit and Iran's nuclear enrichment right. - Iran wants to retain control of the strait and impose transit fees, leading to expected periodic violence against commercial shipping. - President Trump is mainly focused on free oil flow to keep US gasoline prices low and is looking for a way out of the conflict. - The current MOU heavily favors Iran with upfront sanctions relief, similar to but more generous than the JCPoA. - The Israel-Lebanon ceasefire agreement faces strong opposition from Iran, Hezbollah, and local politicians, making implementation unlikely. - Two parallel US negotiation tracks exist: a JD Vance–Steve Wyckoff track for Iran, and a more traditional Marco Rubio track for Lebanon. - Trump's improvisational negotiation style lacks a set agenda, risking repetitive cycles of talks and violence.