u/Adrian-The-Great ·
Reddit — r/ValueInvesting
· July 12, 2026 at 18:28
· ⬆ 32 pts
· 💬 15 comments
| View on Reddit ↗
AI Summary
Summary
The post argues that Micron’s new take-or-pay contracts with price ceilings at current market levels are a bearish signal, contradicting the bull narrative of a multi-year memory shortage.
Author highlights that last quarter’s record gross margin (84.9%) came almost entirely from DRAM price increases (+62%) rather than volume (+3%), and that SK Hynix’s massive IPO funding will eventually add supply, ending the scarcity.
The analysis is well-researched, citing specific financial data and contract details, making it a credible and nuanced bearish thesis on Micron’s near-term outlook.
Score32
Comments15
Upvote %94%
▶ Full Post Text
An opinion piece on Micron and SK Hynix, following on from SK Hynix's recent IPO and recent publications on this subreddit.
**The tell in Micron's contracts nobody seems to be reading**
SK Hynix's CEO said last week that the memory shortage will run past 2030 — right after raising $26.5B, the largest US listing ever by a foreign company, to build the fabs that would end it. Everyone read those two facts as confirming each other. I think they contradict each other, and the mechanism is the oldest one in economics: scarcity raises the price, the price funds the capacity, the capacity ends the scarcity.
But the detail that actually changed my mind is in Micron's prepared remarks. Its sixteen new take-or-pay agreements — running to 2030, \~$100B in remaining performance obligations — carry a **price ceiling set at current market prices**, covering roughly 40% of company revenue. At the peak of the greatest pricing environment memory has ever seen, Micron has agreed to cap what it can charge its largest customers for five years.
You don't sell five years of upside cheaply in a market you think stays this good. You sell it because you want the floor, and the floor has to be paid for. Nvidia hasn't done this. TSMC hasn't. ASML hasn't. Companies with moats don't need to buy stability — they have it.
The other number worth sitting with: last quarter's record came almost entirely from price, not volume. DRAM bits shipped rose \~3%. DRAM prices rose \~62%. Same company, same factories — gross margin went from **-9.1% in FY2023 to 84.9% last quarter.** Nothing about the business changed. The price of DRAM did.
The other number worth sitting with: last quarter's record came almost entirely from price, not volume. DRAM bits shipped rose \~3%. DRAM prices rose \~62%. Same company, same factories — gross margin went from **-9.1% in FY2023 to 84.9% last quarter.** Nothing about the business changed. The price of DRAM did.
I wrote it up properly with the numbers here: [https://wonderfulatafairprice.substack.com/p/micron-stock-and-the-265-billion](https://wonderfulatafairprice.substack.com/p/micron-stock-and-the-265-billion)
Happy to be argued with — the bull case on HBM is genuinely strong and I may be wrong about the mix shift.
Micron locked in ~$100B in take-or-pay agreements with price ceilings at current market levels through 2030, covering ~40% of revenue. Record gross margin of 84.9% was driven by price (+62%), not volume (+3%). Selling upside cheaply indicates management expects prices to decline; the cycle is peaking. SK Hynix’s $26.5B IPO will fund capacity that ends the shortage, reinforcing the bearish commodity cycle logic. Micron’s business is highly commodity-like, and the price ceiling contracts confirm the market is near peak pricing. Shorting Micron offers a play on mean reversion in DRAM prices. HBM demand could sustain high prices longer than expected; Micron’s contract floors may provide downside protection; the memory shortage could extend past 2030.
This Reddit post, published July 12, 2026,
features u/Adrian-The-Great
discussing MU.
1 trade idea extracted by AI with direction and confidence scoring.