FICO is a slow growth company priced at 30x PE? What am I missing?

u/Delicious_Invite_127 · Reddit — r/ValueInvesting · August 07, 2026 at 07:52 · ⬆ 15 pts · 💬 18 comments  | View on Reddit ↗
AI Summary

Summary

  • The author argues FICO’s revenue growth has been slow (~9% CAGR) while earnings growth was boosted mainly by fee increases, pushing margins to record highs.
  • At ~30x PE, the author sees limited upside and believes FICO is fairly valued or possibly overpriced.
  • The author prefers MSFT as a faster-growing large-cap alternative over FICO.
  • Quality assessment: Light DD / speculation — valid high-level valuation concerns, but lacks deep analysis of FICO’s competitive moat and pricing power durability.
Score 15
Comments 18
Upvote % 89%
Full Post Text
Ideas
u/Delicious_Invite_127 Reddit r/ValueInvesting
FICO revenue growth is only ~9% CAGR, while net income grew ~22% mainly through fee hikes and record 30% margins. Fee-driven growth is not a sustainable long-term engine, so a 30x PE leaves little margin of safety. Avoid FICO at current valuation until revenue growth accelerates or price becomes more attractive. FICO’s data/moat and pricing power could sustain earnings growth longer than the author assumes.
u/Delicious_Invite_127 Reddit r/ValueInvesting
The author believes MSFT grows revenue faster than FICO despite being a much larger company. Faster revenue growth makes MSFT a better compounder relative to FICO at similar quality levels. Prefer MSFT over FICO as the better large-cap growth-at-reasonable-price idea. MSFT is also priced at a premium multiple; any AI/cloud slowdown could pressure growth.
More from Reddit — r/ValueInvesting

This Reddit post, published August 07, 2026, features u/Delicious_Invite_127 discussing FICO, MSFT. 2 trade ideas extracted by AI with direction and confidence scoring.

Speakers: u/Delicious_Invite_127  · Tickers: FICO, MSFT