DD: We Are Not in a Dot-Com Bubble Because the Knicks Just Beat the Spurs
u/doctorchasingtendies ·
Reddit — r/wallstreetbets
· June 15, 2026 at 02:53
· ⬆ 22 pts
· 💬 17 comments
| View on Reddit ↗
AI Summary
Summary
The post argues that the Knicks beating the Spurs in the NBA Finals is an inverse indicator of the dot-com bubble (Spurs win preceded crash), so now the market should rally further.
The author explicitly holds HOOD calls bought at Friday close, citing prediction market growth and Cathie Wood selling as contrarian signals.
Quality assessment: Pure meme/entertainment speculation with no fundamental data – noise, not DD.
Score22
Comments17
Upvote %81%
▶ Full Post Text
**TL;DR for the smooth-brains who can't read past the first crayon**
1999/2000: the Spurs beat the Knicks in the Finals. Nine months later the Nasdaq face-planted into a casket and stayed there for 2.5 years. The Spurs beating the Knicks is the single most powerful sell signal in recorded human history. This time the Knicks beat the Spurs. The bears get put down behind the Wendy's.
**1. The Setup**
Every smooth brain on this sub is screaming AI bubble while clutching puts and crying into their wife's boyfriend's pillow. Let's actually do the DD nobody else has the courage to do.
The dot-com top was caused by the San Antonio Spurs defeating the New York Knicks 4-1 in the NBA Finals. Tim Duncan and David Robinson didn't win a championship, they rang the bell at the top of the greatest bull market in history.
Today's NBA finals (Spurs vs Knicks) is not a coincidence, it's a leading indicator. And it just flipped.
**2. The Back-test**
I ran the numbers so you don't have to. 1999 Finals the Spurs beat the Knicks 4-1. NASDAQ then peaked and fell \~78%. The Knicks this weekend just beat the Spurs 4-1.
**3. The Inverse Correlation**
Here's the part the crayon-eaters miss. The market does not crash when the universe is that out of balance and about to be corrected. You don't sell into cosmic justice. You buy it with margin.
**4. The Macro Layer (for the two of you who read 10-Ks)**
Yes yes, hyperscaler capex is growing \~5x faster than revenue, free cash flow is deteriorating, and the financing structure is a circular Ouroboros of GPUs eating their own tail. The top of this cycle will be a capex/financing event, not an EPS miss. I know. I read. I'm not fully regarded.
But none of that matters because the Knicks beat the Spurs. The FCF deterioration is just the bear trap. The capex circularity is the coiling spring. The cash flows heal themselves. It's called efficient markets, look it up.
**5. US-Iran Peace Deal (idk who Hormuz is but he chill now)**
The Knicks were always a chokepoint for the universe's entire karmic debt. Only one of those moves markets, and it isn't the boats. Even The Ayatollah knew this and were waiting for the series to finish (they were in calls). Jalen Brunson sets the top. The peace deal was just the macro lagging the basketball. Geopolitics is a coincident indicator of the Finals.
**6. Risks (lmao even)**
~~The Knicks choke. If they lose, all this goes out the window and bears are right. If they close the series out 4-2 or 4-3, this increases the probability of a crash by 6% and 9% respectively.~~
Original risk assessment, but now there is no risk, ez tendies.
**7. Positions or Ban**
HOOD calls attached from Friday on close because it’s cinematic.
I don't think you guys understand how huge prediction markets are becoming and HOOD is getting a large piece of that pie.
JUNE 12 WAS THE BIGGEST DAY IN PREDICTION MARKETS HISTORY
\- $5.5 billion traded
\- almost 2x bigger than the second biggest day (Jun 11)
Oh, and Cathie Woods sold HOOD on June 11th
Author bought HOOD calls at Friday close, citing “cinematic” timing and the Knicks win as a cosmic bullish signal; also mentions prediction markets booming ($5.5B traded June 12) and Cathie Wood selling as contrarian. The post’s thesis is that market will rally because the historic Knicks-Spurs Finals outcome flips the dot-com crash indicator. HOOD is positioned as a proxy for retail momentum and prediction market exposure. Long HOOD based on a meme-driven narrative and the author’s personal position; no fundamental catalyst beyond sentiment and prediction market hype. Holding short-dated options over a weekend is extremely high risk (as noted in top comment); the thesis is not based on data; prediction market growth may not translate to HOOD revenue.
This Reddit post, published June 15, 2026,
features u/doctorchasingtendies
discussing HOOD.
1 trade idea extracted by AI with direction and confidence scoring.