Figma Bear Case Feels Like Robinhood Post-IPO All Over Again
u/Boring_Use2125 ·
Reddit — r/ValueInvesting
· May 14, 2026 at 22:29
· ⬆ 17 pts
· 💬 21 comments
| View on Reddit ↗
AI Summary
Summary
The post argues that Figma’s bear case (AI making it obsolete) is overblown, similar to negative sentiment around Robinhood after its IPO that later proved wrong.
Author highlights Figma’s strong metrics (139% NDR, accelerating growth, enterprise expansion) and argues that AI is a supplement, not a replacement, for its collaborative platform.
Quality assessment: Speculation with some data points (NDR, customer examples) but largely anecdotal and reliant on analogy; not deep fundamental analysis.
Score17
Comments21
Upvote %96%
▶ Full Post Text
Reddit sentiment around Figma feels massively overdone.
AI can generate mockups. Cool. It can also generate quick-and-dirty PowerPoint slides. But when enterprise users actually need to refine details, collaborate, edit, manage workflows, permissions, and finalize production work… what platform do they still open? Microsoft PowerPoint.
Why hasn’t Office become obsolete?
Same thing with Figma. AI is a supplement to the workflow, not a replacement for the collaborative platform itself.
Sure, Anthropic and others can launch competing design tools. But how long have those products existed? Meanwhile Figma has spent 10+ years building workflows, integrations, enterprise relationships, design systems, collaboration tooling, and domain expertise. People are acting like that moat disappears overnight.
And if Google is supposedly building tools to kill Figma, why was Google one of the key customer use cases highlighted on Figma’s Q1 earnings call?
Meanwhile:
\- 139% net dollar retention
\- Revenue growth accelerating
\- Continued enterprise expansion
139% NDR is elite-tier SaaS territory. Historically that’s companies like:
\- Snowflake
\- Datadog
\- Cloudflare
\- CrowdStrike
This reminds me a lot of Robinhood post-IPO. Reddit and retail sentiment completely turned on it. Everyone said competition from Webull and others would make it obsolete. Stock got destroyed and people confused price action with product irrelevance.
Meanwhile Robinhood just kept executing, kept growing users, expanded products, improved monetization, and strengthened the ecosystem. Fast forward a few years later and look where the company is now versus the sentiment back then.
People are confusing AI narrative hype with actual enterprise adoption and product relevance.