u/Zyltris ·
Reddit — r/ValueInvesting
· April 04, 2026 at 22:42
· ⬆ 15 pts
· 💬 24 comments
| View on Reddit ↗
AI Summary
Summary
The post is a detailed valuation analysis of POOL Corp (POOL), the dominant global pool supply distributor.
The author's thesis is that POOL is currently undervalued by approximately 20% due to cyclical market pessimism, despite its strong market position, scale-based moat, and predictable long-term growth.
Quality assessment: This is well-researched DD. The author uses a structured, two-stage valuation model based on normalized earnings, explicit assumptions about ROE decay, and a calculated cost of equity.
Score15
Comments24
Upvote %100%
▶ Full Post Text
**Business:** The largest retail pool supply distributor in the world.
**Financial History:** It is a highly profitable firm with a long track record, albeit cyclical in accordance with the summer season and demand for pools or pool supplies.
**Market Share:** They have a 38% market share in an industry now expected to grow about in line with the overall economy, which is approximately 4-6% annually.
**Competition:** It is the dominant supplier in a fragmented industry where most competitors are comparatively much smaller or regional, though I have doubts that this advantage should last forever.
**Macroeconomy:** Considering that the industry itself is cyclical, I think that growth will be low in the short-term, but that it should increase in future periods as new bull markets appear (ultimately averaging out in the long term as previously specified). Due to the cyclicality of the business, I will use normalized earnings. Also, its current return on equity is high compared to competitors, but I believe it will converge on the industry average as competition increases over time. Failure risk is negligible for valuation purposes, due to its size and market position.
**Business Story**, '**The Bully and Low-Cost Supplier':** It is a large company with many resources, ruthless in its ability to deploy capital and out-price regional competition (due to fixed operating charges). This moat is best described as a scale-based cost advantage, or economies of scale.
**Valuation Data:**
* Normalized EPS: $15.43
* ROE: 44.34% (down to 18.33% after 5 years)
* Augmented Dividends: $13.72
* These are expected dividends determined by the necessary payout ratio from the fundamental growth rate to maintain a growth of 4.91%:
* (1-.0491/.4434) \* 15.43 = $13.72
* Fundamental Growth Rate: 4.91%
* The current long-term government bond rate is an approximation of long-term nominal GDP growth.
* COE: 9.805%
* I'll spare the math, but I derived a bottom-up beta of 1.157 based on its market leverage and cash reserves. This is close to 1, which is appropriate for such a large, stable firm (which should act very much like an economy).
**No-Growth Value:** $157.4
\-15.43/.09805 = 157.4
\-This assumes no growth and all earnings are paid out at the current cost of equity. The implication is that the current market price of $202.93 has a growth component of $45.53.
**My Estimated Value:** $252.8
\-High ROE stage: (1-1.0491\^5/1.09805\^5)/(.09805-.0491) \* (13.72\*1.0491) = $59.95
\-Competitive advantages shrink, and buybacks are assumed to reduce as ROE converges on the industry average.
\-New Payout Ratio: (1-.0491/.1833) = 73.21%.
\-Earnings at year 5 = $19.61
\-Augmented Dividends: $14.36
\-Cost of equity does not change; the firm remains in a stable state with weaker competitive advantages.
\-(14.36\*1.0491)/(.09805-.0491)/1.09805\^5 = $192.8.
\-Total = 59.95 + 192.8 = $252.8
With a market price of $202.93 per share and an implied growth of about 3%, evidence could point to it being currently **undervalued by roughly 20%** (due to cyclicality). I did not account for stock options or warrants, which could alter the value.
POOL Corp is undervalued based on a fundamental DCF valuation that accounts for its high but fading ROE and stable long-term growth. Author's valuation model yields an intrinsic value of ~$252.80 vs. a market price of $202.93. The 20% discount is attributed to short-term cyclical headwinds obscuring the company's durable competitive advantages and normalized earnings power. The market price implies only a 3% growth rate, which is below the author's calculated fundamental growth rate and the firm's historical profile, creating a buying opportunity. Increased competition eroding ROE faster than modeled; prolonged economic downturn affecting pool demand; dilution from stock options/warrants.