What happens to the flow of oil if Trump declares victory and walks away?
u/not_my_monkeys_ ·
Reddit — r/stocks
· March 11, 2026 at 04:41
· ⬆ 656 pts
· 💬 517 comments
| View on Reddit ↗
AI Summary
Summary
The post speculates on the geopolitical and economic fallout of a hypothetical scenario where the Trump administration unilaterally declares victory in a conflict with Iran and withdraws troops. The author's primary concern is the subsequent impact on global oil supply and prices.
The author's thesis is that a US withdrawal (termed "TACO" - Total And Complete Opposite) would not automatically resolve the conflict or reopen the Strait of Hormuz, leading to a prolonged period of high oil prices and economic instability that could damage the US economy.
Quality assessment: This is pure speculation based on a hypothetical future event. The analysis is driven by political conjecture rather than financial data, making it noise for direct investment decisions but useful for scenario planning and risk assessment.
Score656
Comments517
Upvote %91%
▶ Full Post Text
Curious what people’s thoughts are on this. It feels increasingly likely to me that the way this ends is with oil spiking well above 100, Trump is unable to bring it back down with bluster, he panics and decides to TACO. He does this by declaring they’ve done enough damage to set the regime back by a century and withdraws, praying that this reopens the straits and brings the price of oil back down before it tanks the US economy and he loses the midterms in a landslide.
At that point, why do you think happens? Assume the production infrastructure of the region is still largely intact. Does Iran open the strait only to their allies’ shipping? Does they keep it shut entirely? Some third option? What’s the impact to oil prices long term if only the Chinese and a few others can get ME oil for the foreseeable future?
The author posits a scenario where a US-Iran conflict leads to a prolonged closure of the Strait of Hormuz, even after a supposed US "victory" declaration and withdrawal. A sustained closure or significant disruption of the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint for global oil supply, would drastically reduce available oil and cause prices to spike "well above 100." The market is underestimating the risk of a protracted conflict where Iran maintains leverage by controlling the strait, creating a long-term supply shock that would benefit oil prices. A swift diplomatic resolution is reached, Iran lacks the capability for a long-term blockade, or global strategic reserves are effectively deployed, all of which would push oil prices down.
The commenter points out that destroyed military equipment (missiles, jets, radar systems) from the conflict will cost billions to replace. This large-scale replacement of spent munitions and destroyed assets necessitates massive new government spending, which flows directly to defense contractors. Regardless of the conflict's outcome, the need to replenish US military stockpiles will lead to increased revenues and profits for companies in the aerospace and defense sector. Future administrations could drastically cut the defense budget, or the replenishment process could be much slower than anticipated, delaying the revenue impact.
The commenter notes that geopolitical uncertainty and high oil prices are historically negative for the broader market. A prolonged conflict with Iran, even after a declared US victory, would create significant uncertainty and sustained high energy prices, acting as a major headwind for corporate profits and consumer spending. The combination of geopolitical instability and an oil price shock would likely cause a significant downturn in the S&P 500 as investors flee to safety and economic growth slows. The conflict resolves quickly, the economic impact of higher oil is muted, or other positive market catalysts (e.g., Fed action) outweigh the geopolitical risks.
This Reddit post, published March 11, 2026,
features u/not_my_monkeys_
discussing USO, ITA, SPY.
3 trade ideas extracted by AI with direction and confidence scoring.