▶ Full Post Text
The most hilarious thing about Bitcoin is how intensely serious people are about it, how emotionally invested they become, and how firmly they believe they are buying or mining coins, money, or assets. Yet when we actually look at Bitcoin, nothing is there.
The confusion originates in the Bitcoin white paper. In it, Satoshi Nakamoto used terms such as electronic cash, coins, ownership, transactions, and double-spending. This created the illusion that the protocol and software he designed track something, that there is a thing to own, transfer, and spend. Yet all his creation actually does is maintain a decentralized record showing which numbers are assigned to which identities. From that point on, these assigned numbers were treated as if they track an existing thing owned and transferred between parties, even though no such thing exists.
Generally, if one owns something, we must be able to identify it. Something physical, digital, or legally bound must be there to begin with. All existing things have some identifiable and measurable form. That is straightforward.
Things like gold, oil, land, or buildings have easily identifiable physical forms. Digital things are files such as documents, audio, video, or software. We can also easily identify those.
In Bitcoin, nothing like that can be found. An identity assigned the number 50 does not possess 50 units of something physical. Nothing tangible is stored, reserved, or delivered in proportion to that number. It also possesses nothing digital. No discrete digital objects correspond to that number.
The remaining possibility is something legally bound, as in financial systems, where people own instruments that represent someone else's liability. A liability means that an individual or organization is legally bound to act, resulting in the instrument holder receiving something.
Liability can be structured as direct or indirect. Shares track a company's liability to its shareholders. When companies decide to distribute profits, perform buybacks, or liquidate the business, they are legally bound to make direct payments to shareholders. PayPal balances and casino chips quantify explicit obligations to redeem a stated amount of cash. In these cases, the holder of the instrument can directly demand something.
In other cases, liability is indirect. Fiat money is created through bank lending, which means borrowers are legally bound to repay banks. The only way to meet that obligation is to produce goods, perform services, or offer labor to those who hold fiat money. Money holders do not have direct claims on individual borrowers, but they ultimately receive something from them because this repayment liability exists within the banking system. The instrument delivers real output precisely because it tracks borrowers' liabilities.
The assignment of the number 50 to a Bitcoin identity does not track anyone's liability, either directly or indirectly. No one in the Bitcoin system is legally bound to take action because Nakamoto's code linked "50" to an identity. The system records the number, prevents duplication, and allows reassignment. That is all.
So nothing physical, digital, or legally bound exists in the Bitcoin system to be owned, transferred, or spent. There is no identifiable substance we could call cash, money, an asset, or a currency.
Nakamoto's creation is a high-tech version of writing your name on a slip of paper, scrawling "50 ABC" next to it, and proclaiming you own 50 units of an asset, all while being unable to show anything that exists beyond that inscription. Declaring ABC to be scarce because you decided to limit the maximum number you will write is not scarcity. It is an arbitrary rule applied to nothing.
What transforms this nothing into something people claim to buy, mine, and invest in is language. When discussing Bitcoin, everyone speaks of coins, money, or assets, which creates the illusion that these things exist in the system. But nothing exists at all. Bitcoin is not a failed or overvalued currency, but a non-existent one.
The emperor is not naked; he does not exist.