▶ Full Post Text
*I would like to preface this by saying I had attempted to post this on December 31, 2025 but was unable due to account newness.*
*As a result I'm posting this now, to ensure those who are looking into FinTech in the current landscape are aware of the risks present.*
\-------
Dave Inc. (DAVE) has recently received a significant threat to its business model as of December 30, 2025.
\***Judicial and regulatory bodies are beginning to clamp down on predatory FinTech practices which are being masked as voluntary contributions, charitable tips, and fees & charges.**\*
\*\***The small news that skipped headlines (but with a big cascade risk) is the Baltimore v Dave Inc lawsuit filed December 30, 2025**\*\*
If the Baltimore City lawsuit (filed December 30, 2025) successfully argues that these charges are "finance charges" under 12 C.F.R. § 1026.4 (Regulation Z), Dave’s effective APR (often exceeding 400%) would violate Maryland’s 33% usury cap and significantly impact Dave's bottom line, profitability and business model.
This follows the precedent in District of Columbia v. EarnIn (Nov. 2024), where the DC Attorney General sued a near-identical provider for charging fees that yielded a 300% APR, rejecting the defense that these payments were voluntary "donations."
\**This led to the case law and precedent referred to as \*EarnIn doctrine\* that donations are not voluntary, and fees are part of the loan*.\*
\**Critically*\* the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's (CFPB) Regulatory integration of the doctrine into the 2024 Interpretive Rule. This regulation has been refined in \*\*December 2025\*\* enforcing the interpretation that "tips" and "expedited delivery fees" are considered "credit" subject to the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) if they are part and parcel of the extension of funds.
DAVE and other FinTech/BNPL/Advance lenders rely on state Safe Harbor laws to bypass APR limits currently.
Other lenders are also getting rapidly hit by agencies (California DFPI v OppFi, Baltimore v MoneyLion, 2025, New York AG v MoneyLion, CFPB v MoneyLion, DC v EarnIn 2025, FTC v CleoAI, Rubin v EarnIn, Aug 2025, and the number of lawsuits are increasing)
The problem?
\*\***More Precedents!\***\*
City of Miami v. Gonzalez (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2025), which went to Court of Appeals final ruling established that municipal charters can empower cities to enforce local consumer protections even where state laws are permissive, effectively allowing Baltimore to and other cities to ignore state level permission laws \*AND apply the EarnIn Doctrine\*.
As a double whammy, the DOJ is naming CEO Jason Wilk as a personal defendant in its amended complaint (Dec. 2025), which is almost a replica of the FTC v Brigit 2024 case, where Brigit had to pay a $18 million settlement for deceptive fee-harvesting interfaces \*\**AND a permanent injunction*\*\*. CleoAI also had to settle a case with conditions against the FTC for $17M.
On an ethical and legal front, recent revelations of exploiting "charitable" nudges to the bottom line $149 million tip revenue, Dave is increasingly exposed to a multi-front wave of municipal and federal litigation, and also souring retail & ethical sentiment.
If these revenue drivers are deemed illegal interest, Dave loses its primary margin engine. Its core revenue generator turns into an unlicensed, high-interest loan.
A single 40k share institutional sell block on Dec 29 over a holiday trading period immediately following the news, is a warning signal investors might want to be aware of if currently holding a DAVE position.
While some risk is built into the current price, a bigger downside risk exists if multiple city & state jurisdictions follow Baltimore's lead - possibility of numerous settlements, restrictions and injunctions can potentially severely cripple the business model.
\**Disclaimer: Previous Dave bull here. I post this to help ensure I give a transparent take on any stocks I have held or hold, especially when I see big regulatory headwinds, as I don't want others to get burnt on a stock. I have exited DAVE due to this increasing risk. Not AI*\*