Even if Frontier Models Are Delayed, Reasoning AI Grows... Why GPU and Memory Demand Must Be Viewed Separately | Kim Jang-yeol, Head of Research Center at Unistori Asset Management

Even if frontier models are delayed, reasoning AI grows... Why GPU and memory demand must be viewed separately | Kim Jang-yeol, Head of Research Center at Unistori Asset Management [Focus Today's Stocks]
Watch on YouTube ↗  |  September 15, 2026 at 11:30  |  39:22  |  3PRO TV (삼프로TV)
Speakers
Kim Jang-yeol — Reporter, The Bell

Summary

Kim Jang-yeol, Head of Research Center at Unistori Asset Management, argues that the frontier AI model slowdown debate applies to training, not inference, so GPU, memory, and data-center demand remain supported. He also sees AI regulation as a potential moat for Alphabet and Microsoft. The second half covers data-center power demand and Korean equities, including Samsung Electronics memory pricing, SFA Semiconductor, Doosan Fuel Cell, and long-term SOFC/nuclear/LNG power themes.

  • Frontier model slowdown concerns training, not inference demand.
  • Inference compute and memory demand remain supply-constrained.
  • AI regulation may favor incumbents like Alphabet and Microsoft.
  • Samsung benefits from HBM progress and DRAM pricing tightness.
  • SFA Semiconductor is a Samsung HBM outsourcing beneficiary.
  • Data-center power demand supports fuel cells, SOFC, nuclear, and LNG.
  • Doosan Fuel Cell has near-term PAFC order momentum; SOFC is the long-term technology.
  • The speaker sees a mixed power buildout with nuclear as the ultimate large-scale solution.
Ideas
Kim Jang-yeol Reporter, The Bell 7:20
Inference demand keeps AI chip demand intact.
The frontier-model slowdown debate applies mainly to training, not inference. As agentic/reasoning AI grows and recursive self-improvement raises compute intensity, inference demand for GPUs, MPUs, network chips, cables, memory, and server racks should keep growing independently. Even if frontier training growth moderates from a 45-degree to a 35-degree path, inference compute and memory demand remain supply-constrained, so AI semiconductor demand is not peaking.
Kim Jang-yeol Reporter, The Bell 12:53
Samsung gains from memory tightness.
Apple's reported approach to Samsung for DRAM at up to 30% higher prices indicates server-driven memory tightness even for the largest smartphone maker. Samsung's HBM progress is a key positive premise, giving it leverage to memory pricing and AI memory demand.
Kim Jang-yeol Reporter, The Bell 25:08
AI rules favor Alphabet and Microsoft.
AI regulation could become an entry barrier that entrenches incumbents. If leading model companies pre-design rules, capital-rich, vertically integrated platform companies like Alphabet and Microsoft are better positioned to build infrastructure, pursue M&A/partnerships, and comply, so the regulatory shift is not bad for them.
Kim Jang-yeol Reporter, The Bell 26:51
Samsung HBM outsourcing drives SFA turnaround.
Samsung's HBM success should force it to outsource general DRAM post-processing. SFA benefits as an OSAT: Samsung's HBM capacity increase can expand outsourced DDR5 testing/packaging, especially in the Philippines, and SFA's volumes are rising. SFA is loss-making now but should turn profitable next year; if Samsung HBM does well, the stock can target around 9,000 won and 12,000 won by the year after. Risks are Samsung's outsourcing policy and potential in-house Vietnam expansion, but near-term competitive damage looks unlikely.
Kim Jang-yeol Reporter, The Bell 31:53
Doosan Fuel Cell wins on data-center power.
Data-center onsite power demand makes fuel cells attractive: fast supply, decent output, low carbon, easy construction, and flexible modular scale. PAFC is a proven technology, and Doosan Fuel Cell is the representative PAFC player. If it wins orders properly, target prices point to 58,000-70,000 won; for a conservative entry, the speaker suggests using a deep discount to target. Near-term fuel-cell momentum is attractive.
Kim Jang-yeol Reporter, The Bell 33:54
Data-center power infrastructure demand grows.
Data-center power demand is not only about electricity; it requires transformers, transmission, and distribution equipment. Grid interconnection and equipment lead times are bottlenecks, making power infrastructure a growing investment need as AI data centers expand.
Kim Jang-yeol Reporter, The Bell 34:50
Nuclear is long-term data-center power solution.
Data centers require large-scale, reliable power. While fuel cells and LNG can bridge intermediate needs, the long-term (3-5 year) solution for large-scale power is nuclear, complemented by renewables and ESS. Nuclear has long build times, but it is necessary for high power capacity.
Kim Jang-yeol Reporter, The Bell 35:08
LNG bridges data-center power demand.
For data-center power, LNG gas turbines are a realistic intermediate complement to nuclear because they offer larger scale and flexibility than fuel cells and can be deployed near data centers. In a mixed power buildout, LNG gas turbines remain practically advantageous even with higher CO2.
Kim Jang-yeol Reporter, The Bell 37:51
SOFC is long-term fuel-cell winner.
Solid oxide fuel cells have better electrical efficiency and are the long-term technology direction, even though they are less mature than PAFC. As data-center power demand and technology advance, SK Eternix and MiCo's subsidiary are better positioned over time.
Up Next

This 3PRO TV (삼프로TV) video, published September 15, 2026, features Kim Jang-yeol discussing SMH, 005930.KS, GOOG, MSFT, 036540.KQ, 336260.KS, Data center power infrastructure, URA, LNG, 475150.KS, 059090.KQ. 9 trade ideas extracted by AI with direction and confidence scoring.

Speakers: Kim Jang-yeol  · Tickers: SMH, 005930.KS, GOOG, MSFT, 036540.KQ, 336260.KS, Data center power infrastructure, URA, LNG, 475150.KS, 059090.KQ