Andrew Yang argues that AI is currently subsidized because companies avoid payroll taxes and worker costs when they use AI instead of hiring humans, accelerating labor displacement. He calls for a token or FICA tax on AI, with proceeds distributed directly to consumers. He cites Verizon call-center bots outperforming humans and $3 trillion of AI spending as signs that millions of jobs are at risk.
- Yang calls for taxing AI tokens or applying FICA to AI rather than taxing workers.
- He says AI is subsidized relative to human labor because AI use avoids payroll taxes and benefits.
- He argues $3 trillion of AI spending will inevitably displace millions of workers.
- He highlights 2.9 million US call center workers and a Verizon study showing bots outperform humans.
- He wants AI tax revenue distributed directly to consumers as checks.
- He says retraining has failed, pointing to coal miners not becoming coders.