The Iran conflict has exposed a "massive flaw" in Western defense: using multi-million dollar interceptors against $20,000 drones is not sustainable. Military tactics are regressing (e.g., using helicopters). This realization, coupled with the naval dimensions of the Hormuz conflict, is likely to shift defense budget allocations toward air defense and naval systems, potentially at the expense of land-focused spending (e.g., artillery). WATCH for a rotation within the defense sector towards companies focused on air defense (e.g., MBDA, Thales) and away from those purely exposed to land ammunition. The "easy money" phase of broad defense rallies is over; execution and ramp-up capacity are now key. Government budget reallocation is slow; supply chain bottlenecks prevent companies from capitalizing on demand.