McWhirter: Blanche Pledge Has Less Force Than ‘Pinky Swear’

Robert McWhirter, founder of the Law Office of Robert McWhirter, analyzes the legal unenforceability of acting Attorney General Todd Blanche's pledge to terminate a $1.8 billion anti-weaponization fund, comparing it unfavorably to a pinky swear. He also criticizes the politicization of the DOJ, discusses the dismissal of charges against an Olympic canoeist and the potential taxpayer costs, and predicts that the administration's broad tariffs will be struck down in court based on constitutional separation of powers. - McWhirter argues Todd Blanche's written pledge is legally unenforceable and lacks consideration. - He claims the original Trump settlement involved no true adverse parties and gives Trump future tax immunity. - He says the DOJ under Pam Bondi and Blanche prioritizes loyalty to Trump over the Constitution. - The dismissal of felony charges against a canoeist is called an embarrassing prosecutorial overreach. - McWhirter warns taxpayers will bear the cost of settlements from bad government decisions. - He predicts the tariff lawsuit by states will succeed because tariff authority belongs to Congress, not the president. - The analysis focuses entirely on legal enforceability and constitutional principles, with no direct investment recommendations.