So analysts from every bank lied about SPCX IPO?

=== SUMMARY === - Post accuses bank analysts of lying/overhyping SpaceX’s SPCX IPO with price targets ranging from $225 to $800. - Author argues the share price will keep dropping as lockup unlocks add supply, comparing the setup to a crypto pump-and-dump. - Quality: Speculative commentary with cited analyst targets, but not a deep fundamental DD — more sentiment/critique than structured research. === SENTIMENT === BEARISH === TRADE IDEAS === SPCX - SHORT | confidence: 0.60 | sentiment: -0.70 Speaker: u/Shajirr Thesis: 1. THE FACT: Bank analysts issued lofty SPCX price targets ($225-$800) while the stock is now fading on share unlock pressure. 2. THE BRIDGE: Lockup unlocks create structural selling supply, and inflated analyst targets offer little real support once hype fades. 3. THE VERDICT: Short SPCX as post-IPO supply overhang and disappointed momentum traders drive price lower. 4. RISKS: SPCX could squeeze higher if institutions accumulate; analyst backing may attract dip buyers; no timeline attached to price targets. Timeframe: medium-term Key Points: - Analyst PTs lack accountability and timelines - Share unlocks add near-term selling pressure - Post-IPO hype resembles pump-and-dump dynamics - Bearish sentiment driven by supply, not fundamentals - Short thesis relies on continued unlock selling === COMMENTS SUMMARY === Community largely dismisses the analyst price targets as meaningless because there is no timeline or penalty for being wrong. Several comments highlight that the banks underwriting the IPO are talking their own book to support future SpaceX business. Overall, the thread reinforces the post’s skepticism and frames the analyst hype as self-interested rather than grounded analysis.