David, a very salient question. There is a fundamental misconception about the impact of AI on news corporation. AI is retrospective and synthesizes generic content, sometimes imperfectly, but is past tense, often past imperfect. We have contemporary creative proprietary content, which is only accessed if AI companies pay us our woo or sue strategy. And we've been consciously building a moat. And it is a moat with saltwater crocodiles, with sharks and an even more dangerous species, lawyers. More importantly, the moat separates commodity content from our premium prescient IP. Now, let's be clear, Anthropic is already set to pay out $1.5 billion for inappropriate use of pirated books, and we and our authors will get a large chunk of that money later this year. And we have a partnership with OpenAI whose expertise will enhance our editorial, business and real estate products, while our editorial will enhance OpenAI products. Now, we're not complacent. We're certainly not naive or digital dilettantes. But we are absolutely confident about our ability to create compelling premium content and experiences in an age in which many AI companies will be recycling rubbish. I mean, it is worth remembering that AI models need data. Otherwise, they are just lines of inert code. They need real time, real world data. And that's what we produce every single minute of every single day. Without compelling content, these AI operators are not omnipotent. They are not unique. They are eunuchs.