Thank you. And so we obviously can't discuss the precise details of confidential deals. But the meta agreement is an important partnership, as is our agreement with OpenAI. And both agreements are more than purely transactional. We'll be exchanging insights as the use of AI evolves exponentially. And you will be able to see the impact in our accounts over the next decade. few years. There's no doubt about that. As for AR itself, we are in the midst of advanced negotiations with several companies, and it is clear that many have come to recognize that the purchase of IP is as important as the acquisition of semiconductors or the securing of stable energy sources. IP powers AI. IP is an input imperative. And as always, there is a mix of wooing and suing. We would prefer the former, but we will never shy away from protecting our property rights. The integrity of creativity must be safeguarded. And for example, as for the perplexing perplexity, we are now not the only media company that has brought an action. And that's because we would argue that the IP excesses have been so egregiously egregious that that even certain other media companies have noticed. Now, we're looking very much forward to the discovery process because we have full confidence that fascinating, illuminating material will surface. We will always be open to a settlement, but the figure needs to be meaningful. And the deals do keep rolling. Bloomberg, for example, buying Dow Jones AI riots, the $1.5 billion anthropic settlement project, the OpenAI partnership, the Meta agreement, and various other negotiations. Now, the way to think about these negotiations is that there will be substantial deals with the larger horizontal AI companies and then multiple meaningful agreements with specialist verticals who require both archive and updates in their areas of specialist expertise. So these are indeed propitious times for our IP.