Management answerSourav GhoshExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Sure, Robin. I will start off by saying it is somewhat of an art, not a perfect science, just because every single contract that we have does have a very different IMF calculation and all different thresholds, revenue thresholds or GOP thresholds, when certain IMF is triggered. And in some cases, if there is deferred IMF, that will be triggered after reaching a certain amount of performance for that property. That said, if you recall last year, we had talked about how one point of RevPAR was somewhere around $30 to $37 million of you. But that was for last year. And I want to remind you at that point in time, our overall RevPAR and total RevPAR gap was about 40, 50 bps, so total RevPAR being slightly higher than RevPAR. That rule of thumb is a little bit different now because the portfolio makeup is different. We did sell the two four-seasons. that in itself brought that point of REVPAR growth equation to EBITDA down. So you're looking at more like 28 to 30 million of EBITDA. Then you do have to keep in mind as to what total REVPAR does. So for example, we raised our REVPAR guide by 125 bps, but total REVPAR was only raised by 75 basis points. So you have to keep that in mind when you think about sort of the EBITDA impact. One of the things is is once you reach that IMF payment, that will stabilize. So it's not like the IMF continues to have meaningful jumps for the balance of the year. With the outperformance and the trigger of the IMF, I just want to remind folks that in times of high performance, it is a more normalized IMF that we are seeing. So this is just that certain properties are triggering IMF, which is frankly a good thing. That means they're outperforming. and we don't expect that to meaningfully jump once it has been triggered. So in other words, what we saw in Q2 was more and we're not expecting as much of a jump into the second half, if that makes sense, Robin.