I don't think it actually changes the competitive dynamic. There have been a number of privately held, scaled power portfolios in the U.S. for years. And so we haven't seen that affected the competitive dynamic at all in the tower space. It doesn't change the way we operate, hasn't changed our results or our ability to compete. So we don't think that having more private tower companies affects that. I think what it does reflect is that there's a disconnect, and there has been for years, in the multiples that private players will value towers out versus the public markets. And we really think the reason that They value them in a higher multiple and have for a period of time is they're taking a long term view. They see past some of the short term noise that's out there, and they see these long term demand drivers that encourage us about our business. You know, they see that mobile data growth is going to double over the next five years in the US, and that's going to require more network investment, which translates into new business for towers. They realize that AI is an incremental use case. It's not even factored into those projections. that could be a catalyst for even more growth and could be pretty substantial growth, depending on how that evolves over time. They're looking at the fact that 6G is just around the corner and that the 6G frequencies are likely to be in the six to seven gigahertz range, which means much more dense networks are going to be required. So when I look at kind of what's swirling around out there in the ether about tower companies in that private world, it's encouraging to me to see that people are seeing the true value of towers And the fact that this is a growing long-term business that will be the backbone of digital infrastructure going forward. And so when I hear the rumors and see what's out there, to me, that just shows that the business model is still the best business model out there. It's still a place to create a lot of long-term value for our shareholders. It's the right place for us to be.