Sure. Look, Wind Palace runs at essentially full occupancy every night. And so when you're at 99% occupancy, you're not making a speculative bet by adding rooms. You're clearly capturing demand that already exists and that you're currently turning away. So adding 25% in total room capacity and increasing the suite product by 50% in a market that's heavily driven by the premium segment just makes sense for us. I think it's reasonable to assume that you could get pretty conservative here, but it's reasonable to assume, you know, $2,500 U.S. dollar feel per room night which is incremental $400 million, call it, of GGR, you don't have a lot of non-EBITDA-generating amenities that come with the tower. It does not have a gaming element. It has very, very modest food and beverage because it's directly attached to the existing Wind Palace facility. And so flow-throughs should be pretty high. I mean, that's, you know, that GGR is probably $150 to $175 million in EBITDA for us. So, you know, to us, it felt like, uh, it felt like a real no brainer in terms of disruption. It's actually, uh, there, there obviously may be some disruption, but it's not significant because it's a relatively constrained, um, uh, portion of the, of our plot where we will be doing the construction and it's at the east entrance. So if you've been to wind palace, that's the existing bus entrance. So our north and south Portica chairs will remain completely open and functional, as will the promenades that run around and into the casino.